Questions by year, frequency and marks

Filter the question bank. Frequency is how many papers a question appears in. Marks follow the common OU pattern: Part A 6, Part B 15, Part C 10.

4320 questions in this view, sorted by frequency.

Quick marks: 6 · 10 · 15 · clear

Marks Question Subject Years Frequency
10 Satyam's wife and his only daughter died due to lack of food. State whether Satyam is liable or not. Law of Crimes 2014 1×
10 A set fire to a house at night to commit robbery. Unfortunately one person died due to the fire. Now decide whether A is liable for the death of the person or for robbery. Law of Crimes 2016 1×
10 A shoots at Z with an intention to kill. Presuming that Z died, he burnt the body of Z when he was still alive. What offence did A commit? Law of Crimes 2012 1×
10 A shot B intentionally and he pleads insanity. Whether he can be excused by law? Discuss. Law of Crimes 2014 1×
10 Sultana bibi has a son and two step sons. Two sets of sons along with one of their relatives killed Sultana bibi. A criminal case was filed against all the three. After three months Sultana's son filed a petition on behalf of his step brothers stating that it is their internal and family matter and requested the Court to release the accused. If you are a Judge, what will you do? Whether you can release or punish the accused? Law of Crimes 2022 1×
10 Suman went to a supermarket and picked some goods and went out of the supermarket without paying for the same. The employees of the supermarket alleged that she committed theft and a criminal case was filed against her. In her defence, she said that she is a diabetic depressed patient and she out of depression did not pay the amount for the goods. State whether her act can be brought under any exceptions of IPC. Law of Crimes 2022 1×
10 Sumitra got married 10 years back. She was found dead, hanging from a fan. When the police conducted investigation they found that bodily injuries were present upon the dead body. What offence does it amount to? Under which Section has the case to be registered and what is the punishment? Law of Crimes 2015 1×
10 A, a surgeon, in good faith, communicates to a patient his opinion that he cannot live. The patient dies in consequence of the shock. Whether A is liable for any offence? Law of Crimes 2014 1×
10 A, a surgeon, in good faith, communicates to a patient his opinion that the patient cannot live. The patient dies in consequence of a shock. Did A commit any offence? Law of Crimes 2018 1×
10 There was a heated argument between two friends. While the argument was going on, one of the friends hit the other with his fist on the left side of the chest. The result was sudden death. State what offence did the friend commit? What will be the punishment? Law of Crimes 2017 1×
10 A thief entered a house and made an attempt to seal, broken the jewel box, but after opening the box nothing was found in it. State whether the thief is punishable or not. If so what offence he committed and what is the punishment? Law of Crimes 2021 1×
10 Three persons form into a group and plan to rob a bank. While they were trying to rob the bank, the bank authorities inform the police and the police arrive and take one person into custody, while the other two escape. Discuss the liability of each person. Law of Crimes 2020 1×
10 Two blind persons entered a bank and robbed it. While going out, one of them fired and a person died. Advise the bank on what it should do. Law of Crimes 2017 1×
10 A voluntarily burns a valuable security belonging to Z, intending to cause wrongful loss to Z. Whether A is punishable? Law of Crimes 2012 1×
10 Without performing ceremonies, A got married with B. B, believing that A is her husband, submitted herself and cohabited with him. A knowingly deceived her and made her believe that she is his legally wedded wife. After a few months he disclosed the true fact. What offence did A commit and what will be the punishment? Law of Crimes 2021 1×
10 A, a zamindar, tortures a farmer in order to compel him to pay his rent. Has A committed any offence? Law of Crimes 2012 1×
10 A is accused of burning down his house in order to obtain money for which it was insured. It is alleged that A lived in several houses successively, insured each of them, and after each of which fires occurred, receiving payment each time from a different insurance company. Are these relevant facts? Refer to the relevant provision of the Evidence Act. Law of Evidence 2020 1×
10 A is accused of cheating B by placing an order and receiving goods with the intention of not paying for them. Evidence is sought to be given that on previous occasions A placed orders for goods, received them, and did not pay in due time. Will those previous instances be relevant, and if so, under which provision of the Indian Evidence Act? Law of Evidence 2013 1×
10 A, accused of murder, alleges that by reason of unsoundness of mind, he did not know the nature of the act. Decide. Law of Evidence 2018 1×
10 X, an accused in a murder case, was absconding, and in the trial X was convicted. Later, after 5 years, X was caught and was tried separately. The prosecution alleges that Y committed the murder. Y was absconding, and in the trial of Y , is the evidence given in the trial of X admissible? Law of Evidence 2013 1×
10 A is accused of the murder of B. C and D are eye witnesses. The police officer did not conduct a Test Identification Parade. At the time of trial the eye witnesses identified the accused person. Whether it is admissible. Law of Evidence 2019 1×
10 A, B and C are accused of the murder of D. A makes a statement to the sub -inspector of police while in custody that "I, together with B and C, murdered D and have concealed his dead body under a culvert." The dead body was recovered in consequence of this information. Is the statement of A admissible against him? Is it relevant against B and C? Law of Evidence 2012 1×
10 A, an accused person, admitted that he, along with B, the fellow accused, committed robbery. What is the admissible value of a confession made by one accused person against the co -accused person? Law of Evidence 2017 1×
10 A, an accused person, disclosed important information pertaining to an alleged crime to his wife during the subsistence of their marriage. Now the prosecution is compelling the wife to give evidence about the information disclosed by her husband. What privilege does the wife have? Law of Evidence 2012 1×
10 X is accused of theft. During police custody he indicated the place where the stolen goods were hidden and the police recovered those goods. Can this information be used against X? Law of Evidence 2018 1×
10 After commission of a crime, the husband was washing his blood stained clothes, which was seen by his wife. In the trial, the prosecution wants to produce the wife of the accused as a witness to prove what has been seen by her. Is it permissible? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2021 1×
10 After commission of an offence, the husband informed his wife of the circumstances in which he committed it. In the trial, the prosecution wants to produce the wife of the accused as a witness to disclose what was communicated to her by her husband. Is it permissible? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 A begins assaulting B. C and D begin shouting that A is assaulting B. Decide whether the utterances of C and D are relevant facts. Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 In a case between X and Y , the court having jurisdiction over insolvency proceedings adjudged Y as an insolvent. Z, another creditor of Y , filed a suit against Y for recovery of the loan amount. Is the judgment of the court that Y is an adjudged insolvent binding on Z? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 In a case of custodial rape, where sexual intercourse by the accused is proved, the prosecutrix stated in court that she had not consented to the sexual act. What type of presumption can be raised by the court in this regard? What is the effect of such a presumption? Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 In a case of honour killing of six persons, one of the injured persons, who died subsequently, told his brother as to who were the assailants. The same was not mentioned in the FIR nor in the police statement. What is the relevancy of the statement given to the deceased's brother? Law of Evidence 2022 1×
10 In a case of insolvency proceeding between A and B, the court of competent jurisdiction adjudged A as an insolvent. Thereafter C, another creditor, filed a case against A for recovery of the loan amount. What is the legal status of the judgment given by the court between A and B? Is it binding on C? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2021 1×
10 A is charged for committing a crime at Hyderabad on a certain day. He wants to prove that he was at Delhi on that day. Is it a relevant fact? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2013 1×
10 A is charged for committing murder at Hyderabad on a particular date. A contends that he was at Delhi on that particular date. Is it relevant? Discuss the relevant provision of the Evidence Act. Law of Evidence 2015 1×
10 X was charged with committing the murder of his wife. He wrote a letter, addressed to the police inspector, stating that he himself had committed the murder of his wife and that he would surrender to the police after fifteen days. This letter was kept near the dead body of his wife and found by the sub-inspector of police. Is the letter admissible in evidence? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2012 1×
10 X was charged with committing the murder of his wife. X wrote a letter stating that he had committed the crime, and this letter was kept near the dead body. The letter was found by the Inspector of Police. Is it admissible? Decide. Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 A is charged for committing an offence at Warangal on a certain day. He wants to prove that he was at Hyderabad on that day. Is it relevant? Discuss the relevant provision of the Evidence Act. Law of Evidence 2015 1×
10 X is charged for committing theft. In the course of investigation X made a statement to the police that he had committed theft and he took the police to the spot where the stolen property was concealed. Can the statement made by X to the police be proved against him? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2015 1×
10 X was charged with killing his wife with an axe. Their son, a child of four years, was beside them. The prosecution produced the child as a witness. There was no other evidence. The court convicted X on the basis of the evidence of the child. Is the conviction valid? What is the legal position? Law of Evidence 2012 1×
10 A child of seven years is an eye witness in a dowry death case in which the father of the child is the accused. The prosecution produced the child as a witness. There is an objection from the accused that the child cannot be a witness. Decide. Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 In a civil case the plaintiff brought a Xerox copy of the original mortgage deed as evidence. Is it possible to admit a Xerox copy of the original? If so, what are the circumstances under which a Xerox copy can be admitted? Law of Evidence 2012 1×
10 A client says to an advocate, "I have committed forgery and I wish you to defend me." The advocate wants to disclose this communication made to him by his client. Can he do so? Decide. Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 A, a client, says to B, an attorney, "I have committed murder of C and I wish you to defend me." Can this communication be disclosed by the attorney? Law of Evidence 2018 1×
10 A client told an advocate that he had committed the offence and asked the advocate to defend him. The advocate wants to disclose this communication. Can he do so? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2015 1×
10 A committed murder of X. Soon after the commission of murder, A absconded from his house. What are the relevant facts in issue to be considered in this case? Law of Evidence 2022 1×
10 A daughter -in-law wrote a letter to her parents complaining that there was danger to her life from her in-laws. One week after writing the letter, she died under suspicious circumstances. Is the letter written by the deceased daughter-in-law relevant? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2014 1×
10 A died due to the harassment of her husband and the death was due to burns on the body. The death was within a period of seven years. State whether it can be presumed as dowry death or not. Law of Evidence 2022 1×
10 A gives B a receipt for money paid by B. Oral evidence is offered for the payment. Is it admissible? Law of Evidence 2016 1×
10 A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that at the time of the sale he had no title. Can he do so? Examine by applying the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act. Law of Evidence 2020 1×
10 A intentionally and falsely misleads B to believe that A is the owner of the land. Relying on the statement of A, B purchases the land and pays for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A. A files a suit to set aside the sale on the ground that at the time of the sale he had no title. Can he succeed? Discuss. Law of Evidence 2012 1×