10-mark question · Part C · Law of Evidence
A is accused of cheating B by placing an order and receiving goods with the intention of not paying for them. Evidence is sought to be given that on previous occasions A placed orders for goods, received them, and did not pay in due time. Will those previous instances be relevant, and if so, under which provision of the Indian Evidence Act?
Frequency
1×
papers in the bank
Marks
10
common OU pattern
Years
2013
Appeared in
- Law of Evidence · August/September 2013 (old) Mapped paper Download
Mapped topics
- Facts in issue, relevant facts and the same transaction — Unit I
- Oral and documentary evidence; exclusion of oral by documentary — Unit III
- Identification, conspiracy and facts otherwise relevant — Unit I
Mapped case laws
Not mapped to a case yet.