10-mark question · Part C · Law of Evidence
X, an accused in a murder case, was absconding, and in the trial X was convicted. Later, after 5 years, X was caught and was tried separately. The prosecution alleges that Y committed the murder. Y was absconding, and in the trial of Y , is the evidence given in the trial of X admissible?
Frequency
1×
papers in the bank
Marks
10
common OU pattern
Years
2013
Appeared in
- Law of Evidence · August/September 2013 (old) Mapped paper Download
Mapped topics
Mapped case laws
Not mapped to a case yet.