Constitutional Law – I · Semester 1

Constitutional Law – I · January 2012 (5-YDC)

Study aid only. Confirm statute numbers with the current bare Act and the official OU LL.B. (3-YDC) 2024–25 syllabus PDF.

Official previous-year question paper (PDF scan) labelled 5-YDC in the source filename. Stored with Year 1 Semester 1 as provided.

Osmania University · Faculty of Law

Constitutional Law – I · January 2012 (5-YDC)

January (5-YDC) 2012 · Constitutional Law – I · Semester 1

FACULTY OF LAW
B.A. LL.B. (5 YDC) III Year V Semester Examination, January, 2012
LAW
PAPER - II : CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - I
Time : 3 Hours[Max. Marks : 80]
PART - A (5 x 6 = 30 Marks)
Write short-notes on any five of the following :
1. Secularism.
2. Government of India Act, 1935.
3. Doctrine of Judicial Review.
4. Test of Agency/Instrumentability of State.
5. Protection against Ex Post Facto Laws.
6. Right to Privacy.
7. Public Interest Litigation.
8. Fundamental Duties.
PART - B (2 x 15 = 30 Marks)
Answer any two of the following :
9. Explain the Constitutional provisions relating to formation of new States
in Union of India. Refer to relevant case law.
10. Discuss the scope of the freedom of speech and expression in India.
11. Explain the nature and scope of the right to freedom of religion in
India with the help of leading case laws.
12. Describe the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive
Principles of State Policy.
PART - C (2 x 10 = 20 Marks)
Answer any two of the following :
13. A and B are neighbours. A, a budding singer, wanted to organize a live
music concert in front of his residence, but 'B' objected to it on the
ground that it would cause him nuisance. Aggrieved by such
objection, A filed a writ petition against 'B' in the High Court on the
ground that action of 'B' violated his freedom of speech and
expression. Decide the maintainability of writ petition.
14. A government employee was subjected to departmental inquiry for
amassing wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. On
being found guilty, he was dismissed from his service. Subsequently
he was also prosecuted under the prevention of Corruption Act. He
challenged the validity of prosecution on the ground that it amounted
to double jeopardy. Decide.
15. The followers of a religion wanted to take out a procession through a
colony predominantly inhabited by followers of another religion. In

view of sensitive situation, the Police Commissioner refused
permission. They challenged such refusal of permission on the ground
that it violated his right to freedom of religion. Decide.
16. A person was detained by police for three days and he was not
produced before any magistrate. Advise the detained persons or his
next friend regarding the appropriate writ petition to be filed in the
high court.

Part A · 6 marks

  1. Secularism.
    5× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  2. Government of India Act, 1935.
    8× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  3. Doctrine of Judicial Review.
    Year and frequency →
  4. Test of Agency/Instrumentability of State.
    Year and frequency →
  5. Protection against Ex Post Facto Laws.
    Year and frequency →
  6. Right to Privacy.
    Year and frequency →
  7. Public Interest Litigation.
    3× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  8. Fundamental Duties.
    Year and frequency →

Part B · 15 marks

  1. Explain the Constitutional provisions relating to formation of new States in Union of India. Refer to relevant case law.
    Year and frequency →
  2. Discuss the scope of the freedom of speech and expression in India.
    2× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  3. Explain the nature and scope of the right to freedom of religion in India with the help of leading case laws.
    Year and frequency →
  4. Describe the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy.
    Year and frequency →

Part C · 10 marks

  1. A and B are neighbours. A, a budding singer, wanted to organize a live music concert in front of his residence, but 'B' objected to it on the ground that it would cause him nuisance. Aggrieved by such objection, A filed a writ petition against 'B' in the High Court on the ground that action of 'B' violated his freedom of speech and expression. Decide the maintainability of writ petition.
    Year and frequency →
  2. A government employee was subjected to departmental inquiry for amassing wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. On being found guilty, he was dismissed from his service. Subsequently he was also prosecuted under the prevention of Corruption Act. He challenged the validity of prosecution on the ground that it amounted to double jeopardy. Decide.
    Year and frequency →
  3. The followers of a religion wanted to take out a procession through a colony predominantly inhabited by followers of another religion. In view of sensitive situation, the Police Commissioner refused permission. They challenged such refusal of permission on the ground that it violated his right to freedom of religion. Decide.
    Year and frequency →
  4. A person was detained by police for three days and he was not produced before any magistrate. Advise the detained persons or his next friend regarding the appropriate writ petition to be filed in the high court.
    Year and frequency →