Osmania University · Faculty of Law
Public International Law · July/August 2019
July/August 2019 · Public International Law · Semester 4
FACULTY OF LAW
LL.B. (3 YDC) II - Year IV - Semester Examination, July / August 2019
Subject: LAW
PAPER - II: PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
Code: 15117 | Time: 3 Hours | Max. Marks: 80
PART - A (5 x 6 = 30 Marks) — Answer any FIVE of the following:
1. Asylum.
2. Custom.
3. Hugo Grotius.
4. Contiguous Belt.
5. Sanctions in International Law.
6. Jus cogens.
7. Piracy.
8. Nationality.
PART - B (2 x 15 = 30 Marks) — Answer any TWO of the following:
9. "International law is not law in the strict sense". Critically examine this statement.
10. What are the sources of International Law? Considering their relative importance, how are they
recognized by the Court of International Justice?
11. "A State is and becomes an international person through recognition only, through recognition
and industry". Discuss.
12. Differentiate between High Seas, Territorial waters, contiguous zone and continental shelf.
PART - C (2 x 10 = 20 Marks) — Answer any TWO of the following:
13. The Government of State 'A' is overthrown, and the rebels establish a new Government. State B
continues to recognize the old Government as the de jure Government but accords de facto
recognition to the new Government. The new Government files a suit in State B against a Bank for
recovery of certain moneys belonging to it as the lawful representative of the state. How would you
decide?
14. State A launches an earth satellite which falls on the territory of State B. State A asks for its
return, while State B counter-claims for damage caused to its property.
15. State A obtains custody of an accused person who took refuge in State B, by means involving a
violation of the law of the latter state. Can he plead that this circumstance constitutes a bar to his
trial in the former State?
16. The Government of Kelontan entered into a contract with a British Company in respect of
certain mining operations. The contract contained an Arbitration clause, pursuant to which an
award was made in favour of Kelontan. The British Company sued in England for enforcement of the
award. Kelontan claims immunity from jurisdiction.