Environmental Law · Semester 1

Environmental Law · August/September 2015

Study aid only. Confirm statute numbers with the current bare Act and the official OU LL.B. (3-YDC) 2024–25 syllabus PDF.

Official previous-year question paper (PDF scan), OU LL.B. Year 1 Semester 1. Download the file; question-to-topic mapping can be added later from this paper.

Osmania University · Faculty of Law

Environmental Law · August/September 2015

August/September 2015 · Environmental Law · Semester 1

FACULTY OF LAW
LL.B. (3 YDC) I -Year I-Semester Examination, August / September 2015
Subject: LAW
PAPER - V: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Code: 6175 | Time: 3 Hours | Max. Marks: 80
PART - A (5 x 6 = 30 Marks) — Answer any five of the following.
1. Meaning of Environment.
2. Polluter Pay's Principle.
3. Biosphere.
4. Global Warming.
5. Acid Rain.
6. Ozone Pollution.
7. Public Nuisance.
8. Ecology.
PART - B (2 x 15 = 30 Marks) — Answer any two of the following.
9. Discuss the causes and effects of Environment Pollution.
10. Explain the need of preservation, conservation and protection of Biodiversity.
11. Discuss the role of the Supreme Court as protector of environment.
12. Discuss the salient features of Stockholm Declaration, 1972.
PART - C (2 x 10 = 20 Marks) — Answer any two of the following.
13. A glucose industry is causing Air pollution by rebasing fly ash and discharging steam. This
cumulatively caused inconvenience and discomposed the people of that locality. But a complaint of
public nuisance is made by a lady only as her husband is a heart patient. The factory management
argued that it is not public nuisance but only a private nuisance. Advise.
14. "X" company fails to comply with the rules of environment protection Act, 1986. What action
can be taken against the company?
15. "Z" company incorporated, seeks permission from the central govt' for constructing beach
resorts and hotels in ecologically sensitive areas such as marine parks and wild life habitats. Can it
be permitted?
16. A notice was given to about 165 days factories to close down the business as they are polluting
water and discharging dirty water on the public roads thereby causing damage to public health. The
respondents claimed that they were doing for the last 25 years and providing Employment to 20000
to 25000 families and order is against Art. 19(1)(g) also. Is the argument justifiable?

Part A · 6 marks

  1. Meaning of Environment.
    Year and frequency →
  2. Polluter Pay's Principle.
    Year and frequency →
  3. Biosphere.
    6× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  4. Global Warming.
    8× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  5. Acid Rain.
    3× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  6. Ozone Pollution.
    Year and frequency →
  7. Public Nuisance.
    Year and frequency →
  8. Ecology.
    6× in bank
    Year and frequency →

Part B · 15 marks

  1. Discuss the causes and effects of Environment Pollution.
    Year and frequency →
  2. Explain the need of preservation, conservation and protection of Biodiversity.
    Year and frequency →
  3. Discuss the role of the Supreme Court as protector of environment.
    Year and frequency →
  4. Discuss the salient features of Stockholm Declaration, 1972.
    Year and frequency →

Part C · 10 marks

  1. A glucose industry is causing Air pollution by rebasing fly ash and discharging steam. This cumulatively caused inconvenience and discomposed the people of that locality. But a complaint of public nuisance is made by a lady only as her husband is a heart patient. The factory management argued that it is not public nuisance but only a private nuisance. Advise.
    Year and frequency →
  2. "X" company fails to comply with the rules of environment protection Act, 1986. What action can be taken against the company?
    Year and frequency →
  3. "Z" company incorporated, seeks permission from the central govt' for constructing beach resorts and hotels in ecologically sensitive areas such as marine parks and wild life habitats. Can it be permitted?
    3× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  4. A notice was given to about 165 days factories to close down the business as they are polluting water and discharging dirty water on the public roads thereby causing damage to public health. The respondents claimed that they were doing for the last 25 years and providing Employment to 20000 to 25000 families and order is against Art. 19(1)(g) also. Is the argument justifiable?
    Year and frequency →