10-mark question · Part C · Jurisprudence

A High Court decides a case, ignoring an earlier decision of the Supreme Court, stating that the decision of the Supreme Court was obiter dicta without a binding force. As a result there is an inconsistency between the decisions of the High Court and the Supreme Court. Is the decision of the High Court correct, assuming that it was obiter dicta?

WhatsApp Telegram X Facebook
Frequency
2×
papers in the bank
Marks
10
common OU pattern
Years
2022, 2019

Appeared in

Mapped topics

Mapped case laws

Not mapped to a case yet.