Questions by year, frequency and marks

Filter the question bank. Frequency is how many papers a question appears in. Marks follow the common OU pattern: Part A 6, Part B 15, Part C 10.

4320 questions in this view, sorted by frequency.

Quick marks: 6 · 10 · 15 · clear

Marks Question Subject Years Frequency
10 A bill payable to "X or Order" was stolen. Y forged X's endorsement and endorsed it to 'Z', who takes it for value and in good faith. Shall Z acquire good title to it? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2017 1×
10 A cheque is drawn "pay Suraj" without the words "or order" or "bearer". Is the cheque payable only to Suraj in person, or is it transferable by him? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2020 1×
10 A cheque is drawn payable to 'X' or bearer. Y steals it and negotiates it to Z. Is it possible for 'X' to get back the cheque from 'A'? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2017 1×
10 The cheque is payable to 'M' or order. It is stolen and the thief forges M's signature and presents it to the banker, who makes the payment in due course. Can M recover the amount from the bank? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2020 1×
10 'X' couldn't present the cheque received from his relative due to a busy schedule. The period of limitation is about to expire on a day which happens to be a public holiday. Advise 'X'. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2019 1×
10 A customer of a bank deposited security with the banker. Decide what kind of right the banker has against the security of the customer. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2019 1×
10 A customer of the banker has a deposit of Rs. 1,50,000/- in his account. He issues a cheque for Rs. 50,000/- to the banker for payment. The banker refuses to honour the cheque of the customer. Examine the legal position. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2019 1×
10 'X', a customer, has deposited jewels worth Rs. 50,000 for safe custody. Later he becomes a debtor to the bank. Explain the legal right of the banker. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2015 1×
10 A customer of the Royal Bank drew an open cheque for Rs. 1000 payable to 'P'; the cheque was stolen. The thief forged the payee's endorsement and presented the cheque for payment at the branch upon which it was drawn. The bank cashier paid the cheque without asking for proof of his identity. To whom is the bank liable for the cashier's action? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2016 1×
10 'A' draws a bill as "pay to X or order the sum of ten thousand rupees." In the margin, the amount stated is Rs. 1,000/-. Discuss the legal position. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2019 1×
10 'A' drew cheques in favour of B. A's clerk forged B's endorsement and negotiated the cheques to 'C' who took them in good faith and for value. C received payment of the cheques. A claims to recover the amount from C. Will he succeed? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2015 1×
10 A forged B's signature on a cheque stolen by him from B and presented the same for payment at 'X' Bank. The bank couldn't detect the forgery and made payment. Can B recover that amount from 'X' Bank? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2022 1×
10 'A', the holder of a bill, endorses it to "B or order" for the express purpose that 'B' get it discounted. B negotiates the bill to 'C' who takes it bona fide and for value. Explain the position of 'C'. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2016 1×
10 The holder of a promissory note for Rs. 25,000 endorses it and endorsee's the promissory note. Explain the legal consequences of such an endorsement. [wording partly obscured in the source photograph]. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2021 1×
10 If a cheque is payable to 'X' or order, and 'X' adds the words "pay to Y" or "pay to Y or order," examine the consequences of such an endorsement. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2021 1×
10 If 'X', the endorser of a negotiable instrument on cheque, endorses it in blank and transfers it to 'Y', who in turn endorses it in favour of 'Z'. 'Z' in turn transfers it without any endorsement to 'Q'. If the cheque is dishonoured, who can 'Q' sue? Decide. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2019 1×
10 An Income Tax Officer directly writes to a Banker to disclose certain details relating to his customer's accounts. Examine whether the Banker can legally disclose the information. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2015 1×
10 The instrument speaks of "I promise to pay B Rs. 500/- when B delivers the goods," signed by A. Discuss the nature of the transaction between A and B, and whether the instrument becomes a promissory note. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2020 1×
10 "Mr. 'P', please let bearer have Rs. 500/- and oblige," signed by Q - is this document a Bill of Exchange or not? Explain. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2019 1×
10 Mr. Srinu draws a cheque for Rs. 2,000/- and hands it over to Balu by way of gift. Is Balu a holder in due course? Discuss the interest of Balu to receive the proceeds of the cheque. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2018 1×
10 Mrs. Jaya, a customer of Canara Bank, had a locker facility from 2010. One day she deposited jewellery in that locker with proper confirmation of locking, and returned a month later; the manager informed her by phone that the locker was found opened and the jewellery missing. She filed an FIR with the police and surrendered the locker-key to the bank. Is the bank liable to compensate her for the loss of the jewellery? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2020 1×
10 'B' obtains A's acceptance to a bill of exchange by fraud. B endorses it to 'C' who is a holder in due course; C endorses the bill to 'D' who knows of the fraud. Can 'D' get a good title and recover money from A? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2018 1×
10 'B' obtains A's acceptance to a bill by fraud. B endorses it to 'C' who takes it as a holder in due course. 'C' endorses the bill to 'D' who knows of the fraud. Can 'D' recover from 'A'? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2016 1×
10 A person 'D' accepted a bill of exchange which is drawn in Melbourne. The endorsee, in understanding with the drawer, altered the place of drawing of the bill of exchange from Melbourne to Toronto. Is 'D' liable on the bill? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2021 1×
10 A person 'X' endorses a cheque in blank and transfers it to 'Y'. 'Y' in turn endorses it to 'Z'. 'Z' in turn transfers it to 'M' without any endorsement. In the event of the cheque being dishonoured, decide whom 'M' can sue. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2021 1×
10 A promissory note was executed by Somu in favour of Ramu. Suddenly Somu dies. Can Ramu claim against the legal heirs of Somu? Decide. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2022 1×
10 Ramu kept his valuables in a safe deposit locker provided by the banker. The valuables were stolen. Ramu sued the banker. Will Ramu succeed in his case? State whether the banker is liable. Decide. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2022 1×
10 Reserve Bank of India (RBI) cancelled the license of KL Bank. KL Bank wants to challenge the cancellation of license. Where can the appeal lie? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2018 1×
10 A sells a radio to 'M', a minor, who pays for it by his cheque. A endorses the cheque to B, who takes it in good faith and for value. The cheque is dishonoured on presentation. Can 'B' enforce payment of the cheque against 'A' or 'M'? Discuss. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2015 1×
10 'A' signs an instrument in the following terms: "I am liable to B for a sum of Rs. 500/- to be paid by installments". What is this instrument? Explain. Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2015 1×
10 A signs an instrument in the following terms: "I promise to pay B or Order Rs. 500" - what is this instrument? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2015 1×
10 There is a credit balance in the account of Mr. Gopal. The banker wishes to set this off against an overdraft in the joint name of Gopal and Kamal. Will the bank exercise the right of set-off in this situation? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2018 1×
10 'X' took a loan of Rs. 5,00,000 from a bank and didn't pay. He also has a safe deposit locker with the same bank. The banker exercises a lien on the safe deposit locker and didn't allow him to take anything from the locker. Can the bank exercise a lien? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2022 1×
10 When is a Negotiable Instrument considered as dishonoured? What are the duties of a holder upon such dishonour? Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments 2015 1×
10 ABC and D were charged for the offences of murder and robbery. All the four said that their intention was only to loot and not to kill. State how to frame a charge. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2017 1×
10 An accused committed an offence under Section 498-A of IPC and he accepted his guilt. Then he pleaded for Plea Bargaining. Discuss. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2016 1×
10 After receiving the First Information Report (FIR), the Station House Officer decided not to investigate the case on the ground that the case is not of a serious nature. What is the remedy available to the person aggrieved by such a decision of the Station House Officer? Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2018 1×
10 A and B were aged and inform parents of C, who threw them out of their house. A and B want to seek relief. Advise them. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2022 1×
10 Z was arrested for dowry harassment under Section 498-A. Later on Z's wife died due to the harassment. Who can file a criminal case, and state whether the husband is punishable for the death of his wife or not. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2015 1×
10 A was arrested by the police and kept in illegal custody for 7 days. What are the remedies available against the police officers who kept A in illegal custody? Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2022 1×
10 X, Y both 14 years and Z aged about 19 years were tried under Section 302 of IPC for the murder of a constable. They were tried by the Sessions Court and were acquitted. Is the trial proper? Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2019 1×
10 A boy of 17 years of age, as on the date of commission of the offence, escaped detection. Later he was caught by the Police and produced before the Magistrate for trial. At the time of trial his age was 21 years. He was tried and convicted by the Criminal Court. Is it legal? Examine. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2018 1×
10 A boy of 19 years of age, at the time of trial, is tried for committing the offence of murder and convicted by the criminal court. He was 18 years of age as on the date of commission of the offence. Is it legal? Examine. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2021 1×
10 A boy aged 16 years 6 months was involved in a kidnapping and murder of a woman. Whether the boy is punishable or not, and if so by which Court and what will be the punishment? Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2016 1×
10 In a case of rape, the accused is indigent and not in a position to engage an advocate for his defence. The local Bar Association decided not to defend the accused by any advocate. The Court convicted him without providing legal assistance. What is its effect on the judgment? Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2021 1×
10 A is charged before the Sessions Court and convicted of the culpable homicide of B. A is again tried on the same facts for the murder of B. Justify. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2019 1×
10 A criminal case was filed under Sec. 498-A of IPC, but the accused was absconding. Victim filed for survival. Advise her, as she is an illiterate. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2017 1×
10 A group of persons with malicious intention kidnapped a girl in Warangal and brought her to Hyderabad, and further they committed rape followed by murder. State which Court has jurisdiction to try the case and what will be the punishment. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2019 1×
10 R had tried to cause grievous hurt to K, and R was convicted for the same. After some time K died. Can R be tried for culpable homicide? Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2022 1×
10 A High Court granted anticipatory bail to a person who is alleged to have perpetrated crimes at a place outside its territorial jurisdiction. Is it proper? Discuss. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Juvenile Justice and Probation 2021 1×