Interpretation of Statutes · Semester 4

Interpretation of Statutes · August/September 2013

Study aid only. Confirm statute numbers with the current bare Act and the official OU LL.B. (3-YDC) 2024–25 syllabus PDF.

Official previous-year question paper (PDF scan), OU LL.B. Year 2 Semester 2 (IV Semester). Download the file; question-to-topic mapping can be added later from this paper.

Osmania University · Faculty of Law

Interpretation of Statutes · August/September 2013

August/September 2013 · Interpretation of Statutes · Semester 4

FACULTY OF LAW
LL.B. (3 YDC) II - Year IV - Semester Examination, August / September 2013
Subject: LAW
PAPER - III: INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES
Code: 4521 | Time: 3 Hours | Max. Marks: 80
PART - A (5 x 6 = 30 Marks) — Write short notes on any FIVE of the following:
1. Construction.
2. Mischief Rule.
3. Beneficial Construction.
4. Effect of fiscal statutes.
5. Preamble.
6. Legislative History.
7. Interpretation of Adjective Law.
PART - B (2 x 15 = 30 Marks) — Answer any TWO of the following:
9. What is the Golden Rule of Interpretation? Distinguish between 'Literal Rule' and 'Golden Rule'.
10. Examine how statutes and rules made under the constitution can be interpreted in the light of
the preamble.
11. Enumerate the internal aids to interpretation.
12. Discuss the interpretative techniques adopted by the courts to resolve the conflict between
parent legislation and subordinate legislation.
PART - C (2 x 10 = 20 Marks) — Answer any TWO of the following:
13. A Central Act was repealed and reenacted without modification. What is its effect on orders and
rules made under the repealed Act?
14. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of 'strict interpretation of penal statutes'.
15. A protective legislation like the Consumer Protection Act is capable of two possible
interpretations. One interpretation would result in denial of remedy to consumers. The other
interpretation world result in granting remedy to consumers. Which one is preferable? Give
reasons.
16. There is a conflict between the provisions of two different enactments. One was enacted in the
year 1998, the other one was enacted in the year 2006. What type of interpretation do you suggest
to resolve the conflict between these two statutory provisions?

Part A · 6 marks

  1. Construction.
    Year and frequency →
  2. Mischief Rule.
    Year and frequency →
  3. Beneficial Construction.
    Year and frequency →
  4. Effect of fiscal statutes.
    Year and frequency →
  5. Preamble.
    Year and frequency →
  6. Legislative History.
    Year and frequency →
  7. Interpretation of Adjective Law.
    Year and frequency →

Part B · 15 marks

  1. What is the Golden Rule of Interpretation? Distinguish between 'Literal Rule' and 'Golden Rule'.
    Year and frequency →
  2. Examine how statutes and rules made under the constitution can be interpreted in the light of the preamble.
    Year and frequency →
  3. Enumerate the internal aids to interpretation.
    Year and frequency →
  4. Discuss the interpretative techniques adopted by the courts to resolve the conflict between parent legislation and subordinate legislation.
    Year and frequency →

Part C · 10 marks

  1. A Central Act was repealed and reenacted without modification. What is its effect on orders and rules made under the repealed Act?
    3× in bank
    Year and frequency →
  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of 'strict interpretation of penal statutes'.
    Year and frequency →
  3. A protective legislation like the Consumer Protection Act is capable of two possible interpretations. One interpretation would result in denial of remedy to consumers. The other interpretation world result in granting remedy to consumers. Which one is preferable? Give reasons.
    Year and frequency →
  4. There is a conflict between the provisions of two different enactments. One was enacted in the year 1998, the other one was enacted in the year 2006. What type of interpretation do you suggest to resolve the conflict between these two statutory provisions?
    Year and frequency →