Osmania University · Faculty of Law
Company Law · December 2015
December 2015 · Company Law · Semester 3
FACULTY OF LAW
LL.B. (3 YDC) II - Year III - Semester Examination, December 2015
Subject: LAW
PAPER - IV: COMPANY LAW
Code: 3094 | Time: 3 Hours | Max. Marks: 80
PART - A (5 x 6 = 30 Marks) — Answer any FIVE of the following:
1. Corporation.
2. Certificate of Commencement of Business.
3. Unlimited Companies.
4. Doctrine of Constructive Notice.
5. Reserve Capital.
6. Statutory Meeting.
7. Oppression.
8. Creditors' voluntary winding up.
PART - B (2 x 15 = 30 Marks) — Answer any TWO of the following:
9. Distinguish between a public limited company and a private limited company.
10. Discuss the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 relating to buy-back of shares by a company.
11. State the legal provisions relating to disposal of unpaid and unclaimed dividends.
12. What reliefs are available to minority shareholders against wrongful conduct of the majority?
PART - C (2 x 10 = 20 Marks) — Answer any TWO of the following:
13. Directors of a public limited company accepted a bill of exchange on behalf of the company, but
the word "limited" was omitted from the name of the company at the time of acceptance. Who can
be held liable for payment of the bill?
14. Sanjeev is a director in two companies, i.e., Goodluck India Pvt. Ltd. and Lucky Winner Pvt. Ltd.
Sanjeev attended board meetings of these two companies on 22nd Aug 2013 in the same building
"Welcome House" at 2.00 p.m. and 4.00 p.m. respectively. (i) Can Sanjeev draw T.A. from both the
companies? (ii) Is he entitled to receive sitting fees fully from both the companies?
15. A public limited company has fifteen directors, four of whom are not subject to retire by
rotation. Is it a validly constituted board? Comment.
16. The members of a company appointed 'A' to be the liquidator in a creditors' voluntary winding
up. At the meeting of the creditors, it was proposed that 'B' be appointed liquidator. Seven creditors
representing Rs. 90,000 of the debts voted for the appointment of 'B' and ten creditors representing
Rs. 60,000 of the debts voted against his appointment. Who should be duly appointed as liquidator?
Why?